Can an omnipotent agent, Jane, bring it about that there is a stone of some mass, \(m\), which Jane cannot move? Of course, a critic of this argument may well claim that one or some of the premises are false and hence the argument in toto is unsound, with the most likely premise to be attacked premise 6: … The stone paradox can be found in Lucretius "De Rerum Natura". Start studying Paradox of the Stone. The problem derives from the question: 'can God create a stone so big that He couldn't lift it?' I'm sure most all of us have come across this in form or another. The intelligibility of the notion of omnipotence has been challenged by the so-called paradox or riddle of the stone. If He can, He is not omnipotent because there is something… [1] I think it is important to note that if this solution is sound, then there is no need to amend the definition of omnipotence to include the stipulation that omnipotent beings can only do logically possible things. One of the most famous problems with omnipotence is the stone paradox. The paradox states that if the being can perform such actions, then it can limit its own ability to perform actions and hence it cannot perform all actions, yet, on the other hand, if it cannot limit its own actions, then that is something it cannot do. If he can create a stone so heavy that not even himself can lift it, then he isn’t omnipotent, the stone is greater than him. If he does make the rock so heavy that he can lift it, then he still isn’t omnipotent because he can’t create such a stone … I lost the page and the quote, however, and my copy is from collection of Latin texts with no index. As such the Paradox of the Stone fails to challenge Divine Omnipotence. § This action is perfectly possible for a human to do, so it is a logically possible action to perform, but in doing the action God would not be omnipotent. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Solutions 1) It has been suggested that this paradox is merely a problem of language; in fact the whole paradox is actually a logically impossible action (Mavrodes) The Paradox of the Stone poses no legitimate problem, and this is so even on a simple definition of omnipotence. Paradox of the Stone Can God create a stone that he cannot lift? I just happened upon it by pure happenstance while scanning through some old used books on the shelf. The omnipotence paradox is a family of related paradoxes addressing the question of what is possible for an omnipotent being to do. The problem is that this statement brings up a logical paradox.